3 years ago with 3707 notesReblog / via 

grantaere:

demon on a bus

tagged as: Good Omens;  Crowley;  David Tennant;  i like this hairdo a lot;  



3 years ago with 2933 notesReblog / via 

morzeczka:

image
image
image

I was watching Ogniem i Mieczem and suddenly I absolutely had to draw Crowley and Aziraphale in 17th century Poland

tagged as: Good Omens;  Crowley;  Aziraphale;  fanart;  art;  ineffable husbands;  



3 years ago with 2767 notesReblog / via 

sisterfrnkly:

7 times Crowley’s s’s get hisssssy. Featuring pinnacle Nanny Astoreth and 1 actual hiss.

(In the Beginning, The Book, Hard Times, Saturday Morning Funtime, The Doomsday Option, Good Omens, Amazon Prime Video, 2019)

tagged as: snakey;  Good Omens;  Crowley;  David Tennant;  



3 years ago with 19397 notesReblog / via 

daughtersofthanos:

Good Omens 1x04: Saturday Morning Funtime
tagged as: Good Omens;  Aziraphale;  Uriel;  Michael;  Sandalphon;  Michael Sheen;  Gloria Obianyo;  Doon Mackichan;  Paul Chahidi;  ineffable husbands;  



3 years ago with 4660 notesReblog / via 

celestial-aziraphale:

“Be easier if we both stayed at home.“

tagged as: Good Omens;  Aziraphale;  Crowley;  David Tennant;  Michael Sheen;  ineffable husbands;  



3 years ago with 28215 notesReblog / via 

athenaiskarthagonensis:

findingfeather:

c-is-for-circinate:

Something that’s been very interesting to me, in this new wave of post-miniseries Good Omens fandom, is the apparent fannish consensus that Crowley is, in fact, bad at his job.  That he’s actually quite nice.  That he’s been skating by hiding his general goodness from hell by taking credit for human evil and doling out a smattering of tiny benign inconveniences that he calls bad.

I get the urge towards that headcanon, and I do think the Crowley in the miniseries comes off as nicer than the one in the book.  (I think miniseries Crowley and Aziraphale are both a little nicer, a little more toothless, than the versions of themselves in the book.)  But maybe it’s because I was a book fan first, or maybe it’s because I just find him infinitely more interesting this way–I think Crowley, even show!Crowley, has the capacity to be very good at his job of sowing evil.  And I think that matters to the story as a whole.

A demon’s job on Earth, and specifically Crowley’s job on Earth, isn’t to make people suffer.  It’s to make people sin.  And the handful of ‘evil’ things we see Crowley do over the course of the series are effective at that, even if the show itself doesn’t explore them a lot.

Take the cell phone network thing, for instance.  This gets a paragraph in the book that’s largely brushed off in the conversation with Hastur and Ligur, and I think it’s really telling: 

What could he tell them?  That twenty thousand people got bloody furious?  That you could hear the arteries clanging shut all across the city?  And that then they went back and took it out on their secretaries or traffic wardens or whatever, and they took it out on other people?  In all kinds of vindictive little ways which, and here was the good bit, they thought up themselves.  For the rest of the day.  The pass-along effects were incalculable.  Thousands and thousands of souls all got a faint patina of tarnish, and you hardly had to lift a finger.

In essence, without any great expenditure of effort (look, I’d never say Crowley isn’t slothful, but that just makes him efficient), he’s managed to put half of London in a mental and emotional state that Crowley knows will make them more inclined to sin.  He’s given twenty thousand or a hundred thousand or half a million people a Bad Day.  Which, okay, it’s just a bad day–but bad days are exhausting.  Bad days make you snap, make you fail at things, make you feel guiltier and more stressed out in the aftermath when you wake up the next day, makes everything a little worse.  Bad days matter.

Maybe it’s because I’m a believer in the ripple effect of small kindnesses, and that means I have to believe in its opposite.  Maybe it’s just that I, personally, have had enough days that were bad enough that a downed cell network (or an angry coworker because of a downed cell network) would honestly have mattered.  But somebody who deliberately moves through the world doing their best to make everyone’s lives harder, with the aim of encouraging everybody around them to be just a little crueler, just a little angrier, just a little less empathetic–you know what, yes.  I do call that successful evil.

It’s subtle, is the thing.  That’s why Hastur and Ligur don’t get it, don’t approve of it.  Not because Crowley isn’t good at his job, but because we’ve seen from the beginning that Hastur and Ligur are extremely out of touch with humanity and the modern world and just plain aren’t smart enough to get it.  It’s a strategy that relies on understanding how humans work, what our buttons are and how to press them.  It’s also a strategy that’s remarkably advanced in terms of free will.  Hastur and Ligur deliberately tempt and coerce and entrap individuals into sinning, but Crowley never even gets close.  We never see him say to a single person, ‘hey, I’ve got an idea for you, why don’t you go do this bad thing?’  He sets up conditions to encourage humans to actually do the bad things they’re already thinking of themselves.  He creates a situation and opens it up to the results of free choice.  Every single thing a person does after Crowley’s messed with them is their own decision, without any demonic coercion to blame for any of it.

You see it again in the paintball match.  “They wanted real guns, I gave them what they wanted.”  In this case, Crowley didn’t need to irritate anybody into wanting to do evil–the desire to shoot and hurt and maybe even kill their own coworkers was already present in every combatant on that paintball field.  Crowley just so happened to be there at exactly the right time to give them the opportunity to turn that fleeting, kind-of-bad-but-never-acted-upon desire into real, concrete, attempted murder.  Sure, nobody died–where would be the fun in a pile of corpses?  But now forty-odd people who may never have committed a real act of violence in their entire lives, caught in a moment of weakness with real live weapons in their hands, will get to spend the rest of their lives knowing that given the opportunity and the tiniest smidgen of plausible deniability, they are absolutely the sort of people who could and would kill another human being they see every single day over a string of petty annoyances.

Crowley understands the path between bad thought and evil action.  He knows it gets shorter when somebody is upset or irritated, and that it gets shorter when people practice turning one into the other.  He understands that sometimes, removing a couple of practical obstacles is the only nudge a person needs–no demonic pressure or circumvention of free will required.


I love this interpretation, because I love the idea that Crowley, who’s been living on Earth for six thousand years, actually gets people in a way no other demon can.  I love the idea that Crowley, the very first tempter, who was there when free will was invented, understands how it works and how to use it better than maybe anyone else.  And I really love the idea that Crowley our hero, who loves Aziraphale and saves the world, isn’t necessarily a good guy.

There’s a narrative fandom’s been telling that, at its core, is centered around the idea that Crowley is good, and loves and cares and is nice, and always has been.  Heaven and its rigid ideas of Right and Wrong is itself the bad thing.  Crowley is too good for Heaven, and was punished for it, but under all the angst and pain and feelings of hurt and betrayal, he’s the best of all of them after all.

That’s a compelling story.  There’s a reason we keep telling it.  The conflict between kindness and Moral Authority, the idea that maybe the people in charge are the ones who’re wrong and the people they’ve rejected are both victim and hero all at once–yeah.  There’s a lot there to connect with, and I wouldn’t want to take it away from anyone.  But the compelling story I want, for me, is different.

I look at Crowley and I want a story about someone who absolutely has the capacity for cruelty and disseminating evil into the world.  Somebody who’s actually really skilled at it, even if all he does is create opportunities, and humans themselves just keep living down to and even surpassing his expectations.  Somebody who enjoys it, even.  Maybe he was unfairly labeled and tossed out of heaven to begin with, but he’s embraced what he was given.  He’s thrived.  He is, legitimately, a bad person.

And he tries to save the world anyway.

He loves Aziraphale.  He helps save the entire world.  Scared and desperate and determined and devoted, he drives through a wall of fire for the sake of something other than himself.  He likes humans, their cleverness, their complexities, the talent they have for doing the same sort of evil he does himself, the talent they have for doing the exact opposite.  He cares.

It’s not a story about someone who was always secretly good even though they tried to convince the whole world and themself that they weren’t.  It’s a story about someone who, despite being legitimately bad in so many ways, still has the capacity to be good anyway.  It’s not about redemption, or about what Heaven thinks or judges or wants.  It’s about free will.  However terrible you are or were or have the ability to be, you can still choose to do a good thing.  You can still love.  You can still be loved in return.

And I think that matters.

Good Omens owes quite a lot to The Screwtape Letters and smattering of other Screwtape writing that CS Lewis did, and this is one of the things.

image
image

all of the above analysis is wonderful and is very much borne out by the book, indeed. i think a lot of this does get lost in the miniseries, in some ways, because it’s not really said quite as straight out as it is in the text above. and the things we see Crowley doing do mostly seem like pranks, don’t they? low-grade mischief, at worst. he walks on the grass. he speeds in London (and annoys his spouse friend). he pushes Zira against the wall but Zira never looks scared. the mobile phone thing and the highway thing are both played for the laugh of “Crowley accidentally inconveniences himself.” none of it seems as evil or wicked as it is. 

but Crowley definitely is… he is that guy who will go out of his way to make your day a little bit worse, but worse in a measurable way, the way that sticks with you and encourages your mood to sour, and to then “pay forward” that sour mood. to make everyone’s day worse. (i bet he’s an utter nightmare as a customer in a store or restaurant, for one thing.) he definitely recognizes the inequalities in a way which Aziraphale, whether a true believer or just spouting the party position, doesn’t. but that doesn’t mean he’ll stop doing what he does, either. he’s not bad at his job; he’s very, very good, in a way so subtle that it can be hard to recognize.

but indeed the whole point of it is free will. he might not be a complete bastard – he’s a little bit good, or has the capability to be. and Aziraphale might not be entirely good – he’s a little bit of a bastard, and has the capability to be. they’ve both, because of humanity, become more human. they are both embodying the malignancy and grace mentioned in that first paragraph, just as humans do.

tagged as: Good Omens;  Crowley;  good omens meta;  long post;  interesting;  i think the book quote that says it best is the;  ''most of the great triumphs and tragedies of history are caused not by people being fundamentally good or fundamentally bad;  but by people being fundamentally people”;  as in people - or in this case a demon and an angel - are not so... a paragon of virtue and/or sin but just as messy and grey as humans;  which includes very much the bad things as well as the good ones;  i do think the show does a decent job of showing that tho even if it's subtle;  and while crowley himself doesn't want to personally like kills kids he's very much the guy telling aziraphale;  'you should totally murder the antichrist the eleven year old child'' and he says it twice;  the show does have a very dose of dark (and normal) humor tho and these things can get lost;  and the book is even big in the humor parts so;  



3 years ago with 4343 notesReblog / via 

liliemsharpe:

threi:

lord  Beelzebub

I am actually terrified…

This is such incredibly beautiful art💞💞

tagged as: Good Omens;  Beelzebub;  body horror;  fanart;  art;  nice;  



3 years ago with 677 notesReblog / via 

jimothycrowley:

Crowley + very snakey eyes

tagged as: Good Omens;  Crowley;  David Tennant;  



3 years ago with 10626 notesReblog / via 

lesbianomens:

Gloria Obianyo as the archangel Uriel

—for @a-poc-alypse

tagged as: Good Omens;  Uriel;  Gloria Obianyo;  



3 years ago with 18324 notesReblog / via 

fairytaleasoldastime:

Michael stans one demon.

tagged as: Good Omens;  Michael Sheen;  good omens cast;  ineffable husbands;  

ยฉ JASONDILAURENTS